On September 24, Google confirmed the September 2026 spam update on its own Search Status Dashboard. Search Engine Land reported that it applies globally and in every language, and that Google expects it to take up to two weeks to finish. Search Engine Journal put the start at 9:15 am Pacific, and noted this is the fourth spam update Google has announced this year.
The two weeks is the part worth paying attention to. The March update finished in about nineteen hours. June took roughly two days. August took under three. Two weeks is a different animal. It means that for most of October, the rankings you look at on a Tuesday will not be the rankings you look at on a Friday, and neither set will be the one you end up with.
Google has said nothing about what this update targets. That silence is normal, and it is also the trap. When a company will not tell you what changed, the temptation is to guess, and guessing while an update is mid-roll is how owners break pages that were working.
So the first instruction is the hardest one: do nothing yet. Not nothing forever. Nothing until the rollout is called complete. If your traffic drops on day three and recovers on day nine, you have learned nothing from the drop, and any change you made in between has muddied the only evidence you had.
What you can usefully do while you wait is read Google’s spam policies against your own site, honestly. Not the version of your site you describe to clients. The actual thing. Did anyone ever buy links for it? Did a previous agency fill a blog with bulk-generated articles that nobody has read since? Is there a thin page per town, per service, per variation, built to catch search terms rather than to answer anything? If the answer is yes anywhere, this is the invoice arriving, and it is arriving late rather than unfairly.
If the answer is no, the other thing to hold onto is that Google itself concedes clean sites get caught. Barry Schwartz made the point: there will always be cases of sites that were not spamming and still get hit. Collateral damage is a feature of any system operating at that scale. Being hit is not proof you did something wrong.
Recovery, when it is needed, is slow by design. Google’s own guidance is that a site which fixes its problems may improve as its automated systems learn, over a period of months, that the site now complies. Months. Not a reconsideration request and two weeks. That asymmetry — days to fall, months to climb back — is the actual cost of shortcuts, and it is why the cheap tactic is never cheap.
There is a wider reading here too. Four spam updates in nine months, each one longer than the last, means a search engine spends more and more of its budget on filtering than ranking. The marketing that survives that is the marketing that would still make sense if search disappeared: something worth reading, on a site people come back to, attached to a business that people recommend.
That is the argument of The Art of Marketing — the difference between strategy and tactics, and why the operators who confuse the two spend a decade rebuilding after every algorithm change. If you are watching your rankings wobble this fortnight and wondering what to do, the answer is in whether you have a strategy underneath the tactics. Most people find out during an update that they did not.
If you would like help designing an online marketing plan, contact me directly. If you’d like to learn more about online marketing, you can review the digital marketing page and find links to the specifc SEO, AEO, GEO, content gap analysis, and directory sync here, and contact links on those pages if you prefer to contract someone to design and implement the plan.